Nothing triggers a debate
over news media bias quite like a good old-fashion presidential election. As MSNBC and Fox News have openly staked
out their respective liberal and conservative territory, it is no secret to the
public that bias is inevitable even in the most bipartisan issue. In fact,
according to a survey conducted but the Pew Research Center in fall of 2012,
seventy-seven percent of those surveyed believe that the media “tend to favor
one side.”
In their highly acclaimed 2004 research, professors of economics Dr. Tim Groseclose of UCLA and Dr. Jeff
Milyo of Stanford University developed a method to quantitatively measure the
bias of major media sources. Long story short, by ranking well-known
politicians’ level of liberalism and conservatism (100 for most liberal and 0
for most conservative), Groseclose and Milyo were able to calibrate the
political bias of 20 of America’s major media outlets. Summarized in the table
below with 18 of the 20 major sources of news scoring left of center, the final
report concluded that the “results show a strong liberal bias.”
Newspaper rankings can be seen here.
In another very
interesting research by two University of Chicago economists, Matthew Gentzkow
and Jesse Shapiro, found that there are subtle but very intentional differences
regarding the rhetoric politicians choose to use depending on their political
party, “for instance, conservatives often say ‘illegal aliens’ when liberal
prefers ‘undocumented workers’…what liberals refer to as ‘the estate tax,’
conservative call ‘the death tax’.” Considering the very different connotations
between the phrases, with “illegal aliens” implying that immigrants are
unwanted outsiders and “undocumented workers” implying unfortunate but hard
working individuals, it is not hard to determine each political party’s stance
on the issue of illegal immigration. With other examples such as one party
calling the same war the “war in Iraq” and another the “global war on terror”,
a newspaper or new media’s seemingly innocent decision to use certain phrases
over other actually subtly points to their political bias.
While there are those who
believe the media to be very politically biased, there are still those who
argue that the media is more centralist than most would think. According to a Washington Post article, there are five
main reasons why people today believe that the media is biased.
- Internet Access
With technology, people have more access to more sources of news therefore our chances of reading biased information has increased. - Media WatchdogsAn entire industry
exists just to point out “media’s alleged failings”
- Entertainment vs. NewsThere’s very
distinct difference between a cable channel’s news reports versus its news programs
which exist specifically for the sake of entertainment. News reports themselves are actually quite objective while the programs are very biased.
- We know more and can second-guessThe more you know,
the more you realize how much you don’t know.
- People believe their preferred news sources are objective and fair while others are notWe like to hear that our opinions are right and the other side is wrong.
This is a very interesting aspect of the whole production of presidential election season. Regardless of how truly accurate sources are, people are going to believe the outlets that they prefer, which leaves their minds open to whatever information comes flowing from their news source. This could lead to completely ludicrous media being shared, which I think is a major contribution to the polarization in today's political system.
ReplyDeleteI love this post. For me, the entertainment vs news factor is the biggest reason that so many media outlets are viewed as biased. It seems like pundits are quick to sensationalize everything and try to turn even the smallest controversy into a debate of epic proportions. I think that if people watch several news sources, they're more likely to get a complete picture of the political spectrum and pulse of most Americans, but most people don't do this because it's easier to just watch one news outlet due to time constraints, or as you wrote, because people want to see things they agree with.
ReplyDeleteI've always noticed that the two opposing parties choose their words carefully to fit in with their own rhetorical arguments. If you read the same news story on Fox and MSNBC, you will see notable differences in the way the story is presented. I personally try to find the most unbiased news station possible, so that way I get the straight facts and can formulate an opinion on my own. Personally, I have found that BBC is the best for this, since they have little stake in what happens in the American government. This is a very interesting post.
ReplyDeleteThis is a very interesting perspective to take into account when making a decision. Both liberal and conservative networks exists but most of the media is intended towards a younger demographic, therefore, it is perceived as liberal. No form of media is the best but it is up to you to decide what you want to hear.
ReplyDeleteAnything can be seen as bias. My personal favorites are the pictures they decide to use of their party representatives and the ones against their "biased" parties. There has been bias ever since the first televised debate, where allegedly the lights on Nixon were at a higher intensity than Kennedy's, forcing Nixon to sweat as much as he did, but still have the ability to sound cool and collective on the radio. It's interesting to see the media have this much of an ability to manipulate the minds of naive people if they wanted to.
ReplyDeleteCNN is the news choice for the HUB, which I have never really watched before coming to college. When I tell people this, they automatically assume I watch Fox News instead. The reason behind this is Fox is more conservative, while CNN is considered liberal. It is interesting to see the facts match up with these assumptions. I never noticed the difference in terminology of the two news stations, but now I think back on articles and broadcasts, it seems evident. I think it is important to research the news presented, and take your own personal stance.
ReplyDeleteWhat a great topic Lisha! When writing my political blog, I try my best to provide unbiased information, but how can that be if I am using biased sources of information? It is not just news sites that are biased, but also textbooks that are used in schools around the world. For example, textbooks in the south used to have a versions of the Civil War that were very different from accounts of the Civil War in the north. I also like the chart of the words that Democrats use versus Conservatives. Great post!
ReplyDelete