As rebellious and restless as the Baby Boomers of the turbulent
Sixties were, our generation of young adults may be giving them a run for their
money. The Millennial Generation is arguably one of the most polarizing to
their parents as they are one of the most liberal and less religious
demographics in American history. This is not to say in any way, that
liberalness equates to rebellion, but it does mean that this younger population
has very different views compared to times past.
Yet, similar to religion, more often than not, political
affiliation is an heirloom. And one deeply, deeply rooted in familial identity.
So how are the sides between liberalism and conservatism chosen? Are they
simply passed down and firmly fixed by how we are raised? Is it even something
we have the freedom to choose?
There is this common and fairly rational belief that the younger
populace tends to lean more left than the more traditional, firmly-rooted older
one. And this assumption appears to be make a lot of sense. Generally speaking,
young adults are more open to new and different ideas as they are still
developing their sense of value and self; and thus are more inclined to be
liberal as the Democratic Party heavily favors progression and reform. But
according to an article by the New York Times, this conclusion is as
valid as a "broken clock"; accurate at times, but mostly due to luck.
What really influences a political affiliation is time
mentality. Contrary to belief, we actually hold limited power over what
side of the political spectrum we decide to align with because this decision
was more strongly influenced by the quiet power of history, past and present.
Academic research by political scientists Yair Ghitza and Andrew
Gelman has found that generations have "ideological identities" and
that political affiliations are established by events surrounding a person’s
early years. This awareness of the world and its social conflicts can begin as young as
10 years old.
Think about it. As a population, the Millennial Generation grew up
during times of the infamous Iraq War and a struggling economy, both heavily
blamed on the Republican Bush
administration. And then after Bush, the young population witnessed the
historical victory of current President Barack Obama. It also discussed and
followed the long battle for gay marriage, seen the horrors of Sandy Hook and
other related gun initiated tragedies, rallied for climate change laws, and
amnesty for illegal immigrants. It’s no wonder this generation is more liberal.
It grew up in a time of liberal dominance.
And to show this concept of time mentality holds, the rebellious
liberals of the 1960’s came of age with the “glamour of John F. Kennedy.” “The
babies of the late 1960s and early 1970s, [who] entered political consciousness
during the Reagan years” and consequently, leaned Republican.
And once a side is picked, a person will be hard pressed to change
it throughout his or her entire lifetime. Check out this interactive model of how birth
year influences political views. Drag the bar and you can see a pattern of
political mentality plotted against time. According to the data gathered,
"events at age 18 are about three time as powerful as those at age
40". So once you pick a side, you're pretty much in for life.
And this is what puts the Democratic Party at such a dangerous
place.They may be bathing in the glory of a mostly liberal population but they are also most vulnerable now as they face a nation fed up with Capital
Hill's political gridlock and slow progress. One wrong move here or there, and
they may turn history's most liberal generation conservative.
So Mr. Sam Tanenhaus, author of The Death of Conservatism, may say that “conservatism is exhausted and
quite possibly dead”, but the generation is still young and coming of age. According
to the Newsmax article, the youngest
voters for the upcoming 2016 election were born in 1998, and “are probably too
young to recall the Bush presidency, the reasons for the Iraq war, or even
perhaps the euphoria surround Barack Obama’s Campaign”.
In short: nothing is locked in and everything is still up for grabs.
Pressure’s on left wing.
This was awesome to read, and it makes so much sense. There is this bizarre notion in America that children should hold the same political beliefs as their parents, but it really doesn't fit at all because every generation experiences things differently. Events play such a huge role in shaping people's understanding of the world.
ReplyDeleteThis time period is so pivotal. I always believed that most people join the same political party as their parents. However, I have seen many of my peers take a different path than their parents. It is very interesting that your birth year effects your political views.
ReplyDeleteI find the interactive model of how birth year affects political affiliation amazing... It makes a lot of sense that the events and political happenings that you are exposed to affect how you perceive political ideologies. I think that this upcoming election is going to be very interesting because of the variety political atmospheres that the voting population has grown up in.
ReplyDeleteVery interesting read. I never considered birth year to influence politics like this until now. You write this post very well, staying as neutral as humanly possible as well. I commend that! It'll be interesting, as we will be able to vote in the next primary election, to see what direction our country takes a step in, whether the executive branch stays liberal, or follows suit with the house and senate.
ReplyDeleteI agree wholeheartedly with the premise you took on in this post. People often tend to also take upon themselves the political views of their parents, which sometimes concerns me. My dad is actually an exception, because he turned 18 during the Reagan/Bush era, and is one of the strongest liberal I know. However, I can definitely see this trend with other people I know, including my grandparents, who were all 18 during the Eisenhower administration. Good post.
ReplyDelete